IN RE MARRIAGE OF ZIMMERMAN

No. B211381.

183 Cal.App.4th 900 (2010)

In re the Marriage of RUTH and PAUL ZIMMERMAN. RUTH ZIMMERMAN, Appellant, v. PAUL ZIMMERMAN, Respondent; Z & Z COMMERCIAL PARTNERS, LLC, et. al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

As modified April 23, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Stephen R. McLeod and Stephen McLeod for Appellant.

Law Office of Lynette Berg Robe and Lynette Berg Robe for Respondent Paul Zimmerman.

Law Offices of Paul Ottosi and Paul Ottosi for Respondents Z & Z Commercial Partners, LLC, UZI Capital Management, Inc. and Uzi Zimmerman.


OPINION

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION

Petitioner and appellant Ruth Zimmerman (petitioner) sought to set aside prior child support orders against her former husband, respondent Paul Zimmerman (respondent), concerning their three children, because of respondent's alleged fraud. The trial court ruled against petitioner on the ground that her claims were barred by the limitations provision of Family Code section 3691, subdivision (a),1<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases