1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 183 Cal.App.4th
  5. 183 Cal.App.4th 1337 (2010)
 

LANE v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

No. C060744.

183 Cal.App.4th 1337 (2010)

107 Cal. Rptr. 3d 730

IDA LANE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 29, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dreyer Babich Buccola Callaham & Wood, Hank G. Greenblatt and Jason J. Sigel for Plaintiff and Appellant Ida Lane.

Clayeo C. Arnold, Kirk J. Wolden and Douglas E. Stein for Plaintiff and Appellant John Montgomery.

Eileen M. Teichert, City Attorney, and Marcos A. Kropf, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

ROBIE, J.—

In these consolidated cases, plaintiffs John Montgomery and Ida Lane sought to hold defendant City of Sacramento liable for injuries they sustained when Montgomery's car struck a concrete divider on a city street. Concluding that plaintiffs had failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the divider constituted a dangerous condition of public property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases