1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 181 Cal.App.4th
  5. 181 Cal.App.4th 566 (2010)
 

ROBLES v. CHALILPOYIL

No. H033329.

181 Cal.App.4th 566 (2010)

104 Cal.Rptr.3d 628

VIRGINIA ROBLES et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. PURUSH CHALILPOYIL, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

January 27, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil L. Shapiro for Defendant and Appellant.

Carcione, Cattermole, Dolinski, Okimoto, Stucky, Ukshini, Markowitz & Carcione, Joseph W. Carcione, Jr., Neal A. Markowitz and Chad E. DeVeaux for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

ELIA, J. —

Virginia Robles and members of her family filed an action against their former attorneys and appellant Purush Chalilpoyil, alleging negligence and conspiracy to commit fraud. Appellant moved to strike the complaint under the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) law, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (hereafter, section 425.16), but the superior court denied the motion. Appellant seeks review...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases