BEYER v. BOYLAND

E046564

FRITZ G. BEYER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WILLIAM BOYLAND, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two

Not to be Published in Official Reports


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Lawrence R. Bynum and Lawrence R. Bynum for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lubrani & Smith, Michael D. Lubrani and Lawya Rangel for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

KING, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Fritz G. Beyer appeals from a judgment entered following a grant of nonsuit as to his claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage against defendant and respondent William Boyland. Beyer contends that nonsuit was improper because he submitted sufficient facts to establish a right to recovery under the theories pleaded. We hold that the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases