1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 175 Cal.App.4th
  5. 175 Cal.App.4th 1414 (2009)
 

BAKER MANOCK & JENSEN v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. F056973.

175 Cal.App.4th 1414 (2009)

BAKER MANOCK & JENSEN, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY, Respondent; MARVIN R. SALWASSER, as Administrator, etc., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

July 22, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robie & Matthai, Edith R. Matthai and Steven S. Fleischman for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Chielpegian Law Offices, Elliott D. Chielpegian, Michael S. Chielpegian and Lee S. W. Cobb for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

VARTABEDIAN, Acting P. J.—

This is a petition seeking relief by writ of mandate after respondent court entered an order disqualifying petitioner Baker Manock & Jensen (hereafter the law firm) from serving as attorneys for any party in the probate action pending before respondent. We will grant the petition and direct respondent to vacate the orders in question.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases