1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 174 Cal.App.4th
  5. 174 Cal.App.4th 424 (2009)
 

CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS, ETC. v. SCHWARZENEGGER

No. C058415.

174 Cal.App.4th 424 (2009)

___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___

CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES AND HEARING OFFICERS IN STATE EMPLOYMENT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, as Governor, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

As modified June 2, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Brooks Ellison and Patrick J. Whalen for Plaintiff and Appellant.

K. William Curtis, Warren C. Stracener, Kenneth R. Hulse, Todd M. Ratshin and Paul Starkey for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

RAYE, J. —

In these mandamus proceedings, the Attorney General and the union representing the lawyers in his office, among others, assert that the failure of the collective bargaining process under the State Employer-Employee Relations Act (SEERA; Gov. Code, § 3512 et seq.) has caused a compensation crisis compromising public service and threatening the Attorney General's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases