1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 173 Cal.App.4th
  5. 173 Cal.App.4th 1191 (2009)
 

MAATUK v. GUTTMAN

No. B200675.

173 Cal.App.4th 1191 (2009)

___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___

JOSEF MAATUK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BRUCE J. GUTTMAN et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

March 27, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kosnett & Durchfort and David E. Durchfort for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Roy G. Weatherup, Bartley L. Becker and Allison Ann Arabian for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

ARMSTRONG, J. —

Josef Maatuk appeals from the judgment entered in favor of respondent Bruce J. Guttman, on Maatuk's complaint. We affirm.

Facts

Respondent represented Maatuk, a mechanical engineer, in litigation which resulted in the invalidation of two patents which Maatuk had obtained for a liquid-level sensor. This legal malpractice case followed. In this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases