1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 172 Cal.App.4th
  5. 172 Cal.App.4th 1 (2009)
 

SZYNALSKI v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.

No. B212278.

172 Cal.App.4th 1 (2009)

ALEXANDER SZYNALSKI, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; ROSENTHAL & COMPANY LLC, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

March 13, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lincoln, Gustafson & Cercos, Thomas J. Lincoln and Christian W. Schmitthenner for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Aires Law Firm and Timothy Carl Aires for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

MOSK, J.—

INTRODUCTION

Contending that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over him, defendant Alexander "Alex" Szynalski, pursuant to the writ of mandate procedure in Code of Civil Procedure section 418.10, subdivision (a)(1), challenges the trial court's order denying his motion to quash service of a summons and complaint. Szynalski contested personal jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases