1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 171 Cal.App.4th
  5. 171 Cal.App.4th 1399 (2009)
 

GRODENSKY v. ARTICHOKE JOE'S CASINO

No. A119035, A119036.

171 Cal.App.4th 1399 (2009)

HARVEY GRODENSKY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ARTICHOKE JOE'S CASINO et al., Defendants and Appellants. HARVEY GRODENSKY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ARTICHOKE JOE'S CASINO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

March 11, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spiro Moss Barness, Dennis F. Moss; Law Offices of Andrew Kopel and Andrew R. Kopel for Plaintiff and Appellant and for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Kauff McClain & McGuire, Maureen E. McClain and Robert D. Links for Defendants and Appellants and for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

LAMBDEN, J.—

Artichoke Joe's Casino (Artichoke Joe's or the casino) implemented a mandatory tip pooling policy for the dealers. A dealer, Harvey Grodensky, filed a class action and alleged claims for conversion and violating Labor Code sections 351 and 1194. He also claimed in his representative capacity that the casino had violated the unfair competition law (UCL). After a bench trial, the trial court found that a mandatory tip...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases