1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 171 Cal.App.4th
  5. 171 Cal.App.4th 598 (2009)
 

ANSCHUTZ ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. v. SNEPP

No. B206789.

171 Cal.App.4th 598 (2009)

ANSCHUTZ ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. FRANK W. SNEPP III et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

As modified March 3, 2009.

Certified for Partial Publication

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bostwick & Jassy, Gary L. Bostwick and Jean-Paul Jassy for Defendants and Appellants.

Strook & Strook & Lavan, Barry B. Langberg, Deborah Drooz and Michael J. Niborski for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

TURNER, P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

(1) Civil Code section 48a, subdivision 1 provides that a "[p]laintiff," in order to recover general damages in a defamation case, must serve a retraction demand. What happens when a "plaintiff" is not named in the retraction demand? Can the plaintiff recover actual damages because a wholly owned subsidiary is identified as the party demanding retraction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases