1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MARINARO v. HANGER, LEVINE & STEINBERG
 

MARINARO v. HANGER, LEVINE & STEINBERG

B205629

RONALD MARINARO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HANGER, LEVINE & STEINBERG, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division One

Not to be Published in the Official Reports

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tesser & Ruttenberg and Brian M. Grossman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Hinshaw & Culbertson and Filomena E. Meyer for Defendant and Respondent.

BAUER, J.*

Plaintiff Ronald Marinaro ("Marinaro") alleges that the defendant law firm Hanger, Levine & Steinberg ("Hanger Firm") committed legal malpractice in its defense of Marinaro in a prior suit arising from a nascent business relationship between Marinaro and William Richert ("Richert"). The trial court granted the Hanger Firm's motion for summary judgment because it concluded that Marinaro's opposition thereto invalidly contradicted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases