BUDROW v. DAVE & BUSTER'S OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

No. B205026.

171 Cal.App.4th 875 (2009)

AARON BUDROW, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DAVE & BUSTER'S OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Eight.

March 2, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kingsley & Kingsley, Eric B. Kingsley and Brian Levine for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Seyfarth Shaw, Diana Tabacopoulos; Gardere Wynne Sewell, Celeste R. Yeager and Grant H. Teegarden for Defendant and Respondent.

Law Offices of Steven Drapkin, Steven Drapkin; Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker and Stephen L. Berry for California Restaurant Association and California Hotel & Lodging Association as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

FLIER, J.

Appellant Aaron Budrow brought a putative class action against respondent Dave & Buster's of California, Inc., on the theory that distributions from the "tip pool" to persons who did not provide direct table service violated Labor Code section 351 (section 351).1 After demurrers to two of appellant's three causes of action were sustained without leave to amend,2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases