1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 171 Cal.App.4th
  5. 171 Cal.App.4th 310 (2009)
 

GUNDOGDU v. KING MAI, INC.

No. A120323.

171 Cal.App.4th 310 (2009)

MEHMET GUNDOGDU et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. KING MAI, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

February 11, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anderlini, Finkelstein, Emerick & Smoot and Merrill G. Emerick for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Archer Norris, W. Eric Blumhardt, Allan L. Isbell; Lorber, Greenfield & Polito and Ron U. Lunski for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

POLLAK, J.—

Plaintiffs Mehmet and Aynar Gundogdu (the Gundogdus) appeal a summary judgment in favor of defendant King Mai, Inc., a California corporation doing business as Hyde Park Estates (King Mai), on their complaint for negligence and breach of implied warranty. Plaintiffs contend that the court erred in holding their action for damages arising out of defects in the construction of their home to be barred by the 10-year statute of limitations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases