1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.4th
  4. 45 Cal.4th
  5. 45 Cal.4th 634 (2009)
 

MEYER v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.

No. S153846.

45 Cal.4th 634 (2009)

PAMELA MEYER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California.

January 29, 2009

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Anthony A. Ferrigno, Anthony A. Ferrigno; Franklin & Franklin and J. David Franklin for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

The Sturdevant Law Firm, James C. Sturdevant and Monique Olivier for National Association of Consumer Advocates as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Reed Smith, Michele Floyd, Raymond A. Cardozo and Dennis Peter Maio for Defendant and Respondent.

Robin S. Conrad; Mayer Brown and Donald M. Falk for United States Chamber of Commerce as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

MORENO, J.—

In this case, plaintiffs sued defendant cellular telephone company alleging that its arbitration agreement and other remedial provisions were unconscionable, although plaintiffs did not otherwise allege that these provisions had been enforced against them or caused them damage. There are two questions before us. First, whether under these circumstances, a plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases