SCHATZ v. ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE & MALLORY LLP

No. S150371.

45 Cal.4th 557 (2009)

RICHARD A. SCHATZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE & MALLORY LLP, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

January 26, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, Pamela Phillips, Ethan P. Schulman, Sean M. SeLegue, Jonas M. Nahoum; Rogers Joseph O'Donnell & Phillips and Zachary M. Radford for Defendant and Appellant.

Cooley Godward Kronish, Paul A. Renne and Charles M. Schaible for Nine Law Firms as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Joseph L. Schatz for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

MORENO, J.

Under the mandatory fee arbitration act (MFAA; Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6200 et seq.),1 when there is a fee dispute between an attorney and a client, the client may choose to submit the matter to arbitration by a local bar association. If the client elects such arbitration, the attorney must agree to arbitrate. The arbitration will be binding, however, only if the attorney and client...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases