EXXON MOBIL CORP. v. OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARD ASSESSMENT

No. B204987.

169 Cal.App.4th 1264 (2009)

EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARD ASSESSMENT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

January 7, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Latham & Watkins, William K. Rawson, Cassandra Sturkie, James L. Arnone and Duncan Joseph Moore for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Ken Alex, Assistant Attorney General, Edward G. Weil and Susan S. Fiering, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

SUZUKAWA, J.

On April 20, 2007, respondent Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)1 listed di-isodecyl phthalate (DIDP) as a chemical known to cause reproductive toxicity under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 25249.5-25249.13), commonly known as Proposition 65. Appellant Exxon Mobil Corporation (Exxon) sought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases