1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 169 Cal.App.4th
  5. 169 Cal.App.4th 1246 (2009)
 

RANKIN v. LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, INC.

No. D052124.

169 Cal.App.4th 1246 (2009)

ADAM RANKIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

January 6, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Terry J. Chapko, Terry J. Chapko; Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian, David Borgen, Laura L. Ho, Heather Mills; Bohm, Matsen, Kegel & Aguilera and A. Eric Aguilera for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Timothy J. Long, Michael D. Weil and Mary K. DuBose for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

McDONALD, J. —

Plaintiff Adam Rankin filed this lawsuit alleging that defendant Longs Drug Stores California, Inc. (Longs), violated California law because Longs's employment application contained a question (the question) asking whether Rankin had been convicted of a crime involving the use or possession of illegal drugs during the preceding seven years.1 Rankin sought, on behalf of himself...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases