1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 164 Cal.App.4th
  5. 164 Cal.App.4th 1031 (2008)
 

PLUMLEY v. MOCKETT

No. B196598.

164 Cal.App.4th 1031 (2008)

ROGER PLUMLEY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DOUGLAS ALFRED JAMES MOCKETT et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

July 14, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nemecek & Cole, Jonathan B. Cole, Jon D. Robinson and Susan S. Baker for Defendant and Appellant Douglas Alfred James Mockett.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith and Barry Zoller for Defendant and Appellant Sanford Astor.

Hill, Farrer & Burrill, Neil D. Martin and Whitney B. Hastings for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

SUZUKAWA, J.

Respondent Roger Plumley (Plumley) sued appellants Douglas Alfred James Mockett (Mockett) and Sanford Astor (Astor) for malicious prosecution. Mockett and Astor (collectively, defendants) brought special motions to strike Plumley's complaint under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, commonly referred to as the "anti-SLAPP statute"1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases