MATTHEWS v. INDUS. COM'N

No. 2 CA-IC 2020-0001.

495 P.3d 333 (2021)

Timothy MATTHEWS, Petitioner Employee, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, City of Tucson, Respondent Employer, Tristar Risk Management, Respondent Insurer.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Filed July 9, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bryan Clymer , Attorney at Law, Tucson, By Laura Clymer , Counsel for Petitioner Employee.

The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, By Gaetano Testini , Counsel for Respondent.

Moeller Law Office, Tucson, By M. Ted Moeller and Karolyn F. Keller , Counsel for Respondents Employer and Insurer.

Presiding Judge Espinosa authored the opinion of the Court, in which Judge Eppich concurred and Judge Eckerstrom dissented.


OPINION

¶1 In this statutory special action, Timothy Matthews seeks review of the Industrial Commission's determination that he did not establish a compensable workers' compensation claim based on a post-traumatic mental stress injury, arguing the administrative law judge (ALJ) erred in finding that he failed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases