ROGER S. v. JAMES S.

No. 1 CA-JV 20-0273.

495 P.3d 327 (2021)

ROGER S., Appellant, v. JAMES S., Whitney K., a.s., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

AS AMENDED June 30, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Popilek, P.C., Scottsdale By John L. Popilek , Erica Padish Conrad (argued), Counsel for Appellant.

Edward D. Johnson , Peoria Counsel for Appellee James S.

Arizona Attorney General's Office, Tucson By Dawn R. Williams , Counsel for Amicus Curiae Department of Child Safety.1

Presiding Judge Paul J. McMurdie delivered the Court's opinion, in which Judge Cynthia J. Bailey and Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop joined.


OPINION

¶1 Roger S. ("Roger") appeals the court's judgment in favor of James S. ("James") regarding the paternity of a child, Olivia.2 We conclude the superior court did not err by allowing James to challenge paternity based on fraud, duress, or mistake under A.R.S. § 25-812(E) and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases