1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 479 P.3d
  5. 479 P.3d 410 (2020)
 

ROGERS v. MROZ

No. 1 CA-SA 19-0262.

479 P.3d 410 (2020)

Wendy ROGERS and Hal Kunnen, husband and wife, and wendyrogers.org, a principal campaign committee, Petitioners, v. The Honorable Rose MROZ, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, Pamela Young, an individual; Models Plus International, L.L.C. d/b/a The Young Agency, an Arizona limited liability company, Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

FILED December 8, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Phoenix, By E. Jeffrey Walsh , Dominic E. Draye , Robert A. Hill , Counsel for Petitioners.

Tiffany & Bosco, PA, Phoenix, By William M. Fischbach, III , Amy D. Sells , Marcos A. Tapia , Counsel for Real Parties in Interest.

Presiding Judge David D. Weinzweig delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Judge David B. Gass joined. Judge Kent E. Cattani dissented.

OPINION

¶1 Our constitutional democracy preserves and protects the fundamental rights of free speech and free association. This is especially true in elections, when voters need more information about the candidates who seek to represent them and candidates have nothing but words and ideas in their political contest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases