STATE v. KASIC

No. 2 CA-CR 2019-0143-PR.

453 P.3d 1151 (2019)

The STATE of Arizona, Respondent, v. Mark Noriki KASIC Jr., Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Filed November 7, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arizona Capital Representation Project, Tucson, By Amy Armstrong and Sam Kooistra , Counsel for Petitioner

Presiding Judge Eppich authored the decision of the Court, in which Judge Espinosa concurred, and Judge Eckerstrom dissented.


OPINION

¶ 1 Mark Kasic seeks review of the trial court's order summarily dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R. Crim. P. He argues, as he did below, that his consecutive sentences violate the Eighth Amendment to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases