1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 414 P.3d
  5. 414 P.3d 696 (2018)
 

CITY OF TUCSON v. SENSIBAR

No. 2 CA-CV 2017-0087.

414 P.3d 696 (2018)

CITY OF TUCSON, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Noah SENSIBAR, Defendant/Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Filed February 5, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael G. Rankin , City Attorney, By Alan L. Merritt , Deputy City Attorney, Jessie M. Pringle , Senior Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and Mari L. Worman , Associate Prosecuting Attorney, Tucson, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee.

Hecker PLLC, Tucson, By T. William Pew III , Counsel for Defendant/Appellant.

Judge Eppich authored the opinion of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Vásquez and Judge Espinosa concurred.

OPINION

¶ 1 Noah Sensibar appeals from the superior court's ruling affirming the Tucson City Court's finding that he had violated the Tucson City Code (TCC). He argues that the municipal ordinance in question is facially invalid because it conflicts with a state statute shielding members or agents of a limited liability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases