1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 409 P.3d
  5. 409 P.3d 298 (2017)
 

RODGERS v. HUCKELBERRY

No. 2 CA-CV 2017-0091.

409 P.3d 298 (2017)

Richard RODGERS, Shelby Manguson-Hawkins, and David Preston, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Charles H. HUCKELBERRY, in his official capacity as County Administrator of Pima County; Sharon Bronson, Ray Carroll, Richard Elias, Allyson Miller, and Ramón Valadez, in their official capacities as members of the Pima County Board of Supervisors; and Pima County, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, Defendants/Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Filed December 14, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation at the Goldwater Institute, Phoenix, By James Manley and Veronica Thorson , Counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellees.

Barbara LaWall , Pima County Attorney, By Regina L. Nassen and Andrew L. Flagg , Deputy County Attorneys, Tucson, Counsel for Defendants/Appellants.

Chief Judge Eckerstrom authored the opinion of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Vásquez and Judge Eppich concurred.

OPINION

¶ 1 Pima County Administrator Charles Huckelberry, Pima County, and the members of the Pima County Board of Supervisors (collectively, "the County") appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment directing them to cancel the county's lease-purchase agreement with World View Enterprises for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases