1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 403 P.3d
  5. 403 P.3d 579 (2017)
 

SPRING v. BRADFORD

No. CV-17-0068-PR.

403 P.3d 579 (2017)

Emma SPRING, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Timothy R. BRADFORD, D.C., Defendant/Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

Filed October 23, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. Elliot Grysen (argued), Grysen & Associates, Spring Lake, MI; and Scott E. Boehm , Law Office of Scott E. Boehm, P.C., Phoenix, Attorneys for Emma Spring

Mandi J. Karvis (argued), Robin E. Burgess , Winn L. Sammons , Sanders & Parks, P.C., Phoenix, Attorneys for Timothy R. Bradford

David L. Abney , Ahwatukee Legal Office, P.C., Phoenix; John Jeffrey Bouma , Cronus Law PLLC, Phoenix; Patricia E. Ronan , Patricia E. Ronan Law, LLC, Phoenix; and Frank Verderame , Randall A. Hinsch , Plattner Verderame, P.C., Phoenix, Attorneys for Amici Curiae Plaintiff Law Firms.

VICE CHIEF JUSTICE PELANDER authored the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE BALES and JUSTICES BRUTINEL, TIMMER, BOLICK, GOULD, and LOPEZ joined.

¶ 1 Arizona Rule of Evidence 615 ("the Rule") generally provides that a trial court, at a party's request, "must order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear other witnesses' testimony." We hold that the Rule, when invoked, prohibits a party from providing prospective trial witnesses with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases