COTNER v. LIWSKI

No. 2 CA-SA 2017-0044.

403 P.3d 600 (2017)

Amy Elizabeth COTNER, Petitioner, v. Hon. Danelle B. LIWSKI, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Pima, Respondent, and The State of Arizona, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Filed August 16, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel Feinman , Pima County Public Defender, By Lisa M. Surhio , Assistant Public Defender, Tucson, Counsel for Petitioner.

Barbara LaWall , Pima County Attorney, By Jacob R. Lines , Deputy County Attorney, Tucson, Counsel for Real Party in Interest.

Presiding Judge Staring authored the opinion of the Court, in which Judge Espinosa and Judge Kelly concurred.


OPINION

¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Amy Cotner challenges the respondent judge's order requiring the forced administration of antipsychotic medication pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 13-4511(1) and 13-4512(E), and Rule 11.5(b)(3), Ariz. R. Crim. P., after finding Cotner incompetent in the underlying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases