WOODINGTON v. BROWNING

No. 2 CA-SA 2016-0024.

378 P.3d 731 (2016)

Scott Allen WOODINGTON, Petitioner, v. Hon. Christopher BROWNING and Hon. Kyle Bryson, Judges of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Pima, Respondents, and The State of Arizona, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Filed June 22, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dean Brault , Pima County Legal Defender, By James L. Fullin and Dmitry Kashtelyan , Assistant Legal, Defenders, Tucson, Counsel for Petitioner.

Barbara LaWall , Pima County Attorney, By Jacob R. Lines , Deputy County Attorney, Tucson, Counsel for Real Party in Interest.

Presiding Judge Vásquez authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Judge Eckerstrom and Judge Miller concurred.


OPINION

¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Scott Woodington challenges the determinations of the respondent judge and respondent presiding judge that he was not entitled to a second peremptory challenge to remove the assigned judge after Woodington was arraigned a second time. Finding no abuse of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases