1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 367 P.3d
  5. 367 P.3d 78 (2016)
 

MURRAY v. MURRAY

No. 1 CA-CV 15-0170 FC.

367 P.3d 78 (2016)

In re the Matter of Kamen Rae MURRAY, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Sean Noel Patrick MURRAY, Respondent/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

February 4, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Stone & Davis, PC By Kiilu Davis , Scottsdale, Counsel for Petitioner/Appellant.

Aspey Watkins & Diesel, PLLC By Zachary J. Markham , Flagstaff, Counsel for Respondent/Appellee.

Presiding Judge DIANE M. JOHNSEN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Judge KENT E. CATTANI and Judge JOHN C. GEMMILL joined.

OPINION

¶ 1 We hold in this case that a statutory requirement under which a parent generally must wait a year to ask to change legal decision-making or parenting time applies to a request to relocate that implicates decision-making or parenting time. We also hold that Arizona Rule of Evidence 408 does not preclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases