STATE v. ROSEBERRY

No. CR-14-0277-PC.

353 P.3d 847 (2015)

237 Ariz. 507

STATE of Arizona, Plaintiff, v. Homer Ray ROSEBERRY, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

July 27, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Brnovich , Arizona Attorney General, John R. Lopez IV , Solicitor General, Lacey Stover Gard , Chief Counsel, Capital Litigation Section, Laura P. Chiasson and Jon G. Anderson , Assistant Attorneys General, Tucson, Attorneys for State of Arizona.

Matthew G. Newman , Newman Law Center PLLC, Parker, Attorneys for Homer Ray Roseberry.

David J. Euchner , Tucson, Attorney for Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice.

Justice BERCH authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice BALES, Vice Chief Justice PELANDER, and Justices BRUTINEL and TIMMER joined.


¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether Homer Ray Roseberry should receive a new penalty phase hearing based on his claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to timely raise the issue of an unconstitutional jury instruction. Because Roseberry was not prejudiced by the alleged deficiency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases