STENZ v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. CV-14-0298-PR.

353 P.3d 361 (2015)

Charles W. STENZ, Deceased, Petitioner Employee, Elizabeth Stenz, Widow, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, City of Tucson, Respondent Employer, Pinnacle Risk Management Services, Respondent Insurer.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

July 20, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Ted Moeller (argued) and Andrew J. Petersen , Tucson, Attorneys for City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management Services.

J. Patrick Butler (argued), Tretschok, McNamara & Miller, P.C., Tucson, Attorneys for Elizabeth Stenz, widow of Charles W. Stenz.

James B. Stabler , Phoenix, Attorney for Amicus Curiae CopperPoint Mutual Insurance Company.

Chief Justice BALES authored the opinion of the Court, in which Vice Chief Justice PELANDER and Justices BERCH and TIMMER joined, and BRUTINEL concurred.


¶ 1 Although Arizona's Workers' Compensation Act does not mandate the payment of interest on benefits not timely paid, this Court has held that the general interest statute, A.R.S. § 44-1201, applies to workers' compensation awards. Today we hold that death benefits under A.R.S. § 23-1046...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases