RADER v. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

No. 1 CA-CV 14-0299.

352 P.3d 465 (2015)

Robert and Katalin RADER, as individuals and as trustees for The Rader Family Trust dated September 6, 2002; Delbert and Heather Lewis, as individuals and as trustees for The Delbert R. Lewis Jr. Family Trust u/t/a dated December 31, 1997; Jane Bartelme, as an individual; Karen E. Lamb, as an individual and a trustee for The Karen E. Lamb Living Trust dated February 26, 2007; Mark Loberg, as an individual; David Stanton, as an individual and a trustee for The David Brian Stanton Revocable Trust dated August 25, 2004; Louis and Thelma Vazquez, as individuals; Walter J. Clarke, as an individual; Donald Fruchtman, as an individual; Tom and Nancy Lutz, as individuals; Susan Tharp and Michael Norman, as individuals and as trustees for The Norman Tharp Family Trust # 3 dated July 19, 2002; Jan Sterling, as an individual and a trustee for The Jan M. Sterling Living Trust dated January 4, 1995; David and Hanna Furst, as individuals and as trustees for the DHF Corporation Retirement Trust and the Furst Family Trust, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, a New York limited liability partnership, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

June 23, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson & Weaver, LLP, by Brett M. Weaver , Lrank J. Johnson , San Diego, Dessaules Law Group, by Jonathan A. Dessaules , Phoenix, Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Williams & Connolly LLP, By Kevin M. Downey , Kenneth C. Smurzynski , Colette T. Connor , Washington DC, Galbut & Galbut, P.C. By Martin R. Galbut , Michaile J. Berg , Phoenix, Co-Counsel for Defendant/Appellee.

Presiding Judge SAMUEL A. THUMMA delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Judge PATRICIA A. OROZCO and Judge MICHAEL J. BROWN joined.


OPINION

¶ 1 Appellants challenge the superior court's dismissal of their claims against Greenberg Traurig, LLP as time-barred, asking this court to adopt cross-jurisdictional tolling. Because Appellants have not shown the superior court erred in granting Appellees' motion to dismiss, the dismissal is affirmed.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases