CITY OF TUCSON v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N

No. 2 CA-IC 2014-0005.

335 P.3d 1131 (2014)

CITY OF TUCSON, Petitioner Employer, Pinnacle Risk Management, Petitioner Insurer, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Scott M. WOODWORTH, Respondent Employee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

September 30, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moeller Law Office By M. Ted Moeller , Tucson, Counsel for Petitioners Employer and Insurer.

The Industrial Commission of Arizona, By Andrew F. Wade , Phoenix, Counsel for Respondent.

Tretschok, McNamara & Miller, P.C. By Patrick R. McNamara , Tucson, Counsel for Respondent Employee.

Presiding Judge MILLER authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Judge ECKERSTROM and Judge ESPINOSA concurred.


OPINION

MILLER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this statutory petition for special action, petitioners City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management (collectively "Pinnacle") challenge the administrative law judge's (ALJ) findings and decision upon review affirming his award for a compensable hernia claim. Pinnacle contends there was no evidence Woodworth was incapable of feeling pain in the hernia region and that he failed to meet all the statutory requirements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases