MUNOZ v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 2 CA-IC 2013-0001.

318 P.3d 439 (2014)

Julie A. MUNOZ, Petitioner Employee, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Sonic Restaurants # 10, Respondent Employer, Hartford Accident & Indemnity/Gallagher Bassett, Respondent Insurer.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

February 10, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Hansen Firm, PLLC, By Deborah P. Hansen , Tucson, for Petitioner Employee.

The Industrial Commission of Arizona, By Andrew F. Wade Phoenix, for Respondent.

Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C., By Gregory L. Folger , Lori L. Voepel , and Jennifer B. Anderson , Phoenix, for Respondents Employer and Insurer.

Presiding Judge KELLY authored the opinion of the Court, in which Judge ESPINOSA and Judge ECKERSTROM concurred.


OPINION

KELLY, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this statutory special action, petitioner Julie Munoz challenges the Industrial Commission's workers' compensation award, claiming the administrative law judge ("ALJ") improperly excluded from her average monthly wage the income she had contracted to receive from her horse training and rehabilitation business. For the following reasons, we affirm the ALJ's award.

Factual and Procedural Background

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases