STATE v. JOE

No. 1 CA-CR 12-0730.

316 P.3d 615 (2014)

STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Stanson Kee JOE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

January 21, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arizona Attorney General's Office, By Joseph T. Maziarz , Phoenix, Counsel for Appellee.

Emery K. LaBarge , Snowflake, Counsel for Defendant/Appellant.

Judge SAMUEL A. THUMMA delivered the decision of the Court, in which Presiding Judge RANDALL M. HOWE and Judge PATRICIA A. OROZCO joined.


OPINION

THUMMA, Judge.

¶ 1 Defendant Stanson Kee Joe appeals from his convictions and resulting sentences for kidnapping, aggravated assault and nine counts of sexual assault. Joe contends the superior court abused its discretion in admitting pretrial statements made by the victim as prior inconsistent statements. Finding no abuse of discretion, Joe's convictions and the resulting sentences are affirmed.

FACTS1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases