1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 310 P.3d
  5. 310 P.3d 16 (2013)
 

RICE v. BRAKEL

No. 2 CA-CV 2012-0118.

310 P.3d 16 (2013)

Jay RICE and Betty Rice, a married couple, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Arlo B. BRAKEL, M.D. and Jane Doe Brakel, a married couple; Center For Neurosciences, an Arizona Business Entity and Licensed Healthcare Provider, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

September 12, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence M. Berlin , Tucson, Attorney for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Smith Law Group By Christopher J. Smith , E. Hardy Smith , and Kathleen L. Leary , Tucson, Attorneys for Defendants/Appellees Arlo B. Brakel, M.D. and Jane Doe Brakel.

Slutes, Sakrison & Rogers, P.C. By Tom Slutes , Kathleen M. Rogers , and Diana L. Kanon-Ustariz , Tucson, Attorneys for Defendant/Appellee Center for Neurosciences.

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants Jay and Betty Rice appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Arlo Brakel and the Center for Neurosciences. On appeal, they argue that the court erred in dismissing their claim for medical battery and that genuine disputes of material fact exist with respect to their negligent supervision, medical malpractice, and contract claims. Because we find no error, we affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases