1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 307 P.3d
  5. 307 P.3d 996 (2013)
 

CAROLINA H. v. DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC.

No. 1 CA-JV 13-001.

307 P.3d 996 (2013)

CAROLINA H., Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY, J.R., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

August 13, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gillespie, Shields & Durrant, P.L.C. by DeeAn Gillespie , Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant.

Thomas C. Home , Attorney General by Nicholas Chapman-Hushek , Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellee, Arizona Department of Economic Security.

VACATED AND REMANDED

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 In this case we address whether the juvenile court can amend a petition for dependency on its own motion after the adjudication, in order to determine that the child is dependent. Because we determine that the court cannot amend the petition on its own motion after the hearing, we vacate the order and remand the matter to the court.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 The Arizona Department...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases