1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 285 P.3d
  5. 285 P.3d 318 (2012)
 

ESCOBAR v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 2 CA-IC 2012-0001.

285 P.3d 318 (2012)

Jose A. ESCOBAR, Petitioner Employee, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Marshall Foundation, Respondent Employer, Pinnacle Risk Management, Respondent Insurer.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

August 31, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dee-Dee Samet, P.C. By Dee-Dee Samet , Tucson, Attorney for Petitioner Employee.

The Industrial Commission of Arizona By Andrew F. Wade , Phoenix, Attorney for Respondent.

Frank W. Frey , Tucson, Attorney for Respondents, Employer and Insurer.

OPINION

KELLY, Judge.

¶ 1 In this statutory special action, petitioner Jose Escobar argues we should abrogate Hoosava v. Industrial Commission, 1 Ariz.App. 6, 398 P.2d 683 (1965), on which the administrative law judge (ALJ) relied in concluding Escobar was eligible to receive only scheduled benefits for multiple injuries to the same extremity incurred in a single...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases