1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 253 P.3d
  5. 253 P.3d 296 (2011)
 

IN RE EDDIE O.

No. 1 CA-JV 10-0232.

253 P.3d 296 (2011)

In re EDDIE O.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

April 26, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William G. Montgomery , Maricopa County Attorney by Linda Van Brakel , Deputy County Attorney, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant, State of Arizona.

Preciado Law Firm, P.L.C. by Stephanie Preciado , Phoenix, Attorney for Appellee, Eddie O.

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 The key question in this case is whether the legislature's provision of 240 days to restore competency in a juvenile proceeding should include time periods when the juvenile does not in good faith participate in the restoration process. Because we hold that the legislative scheme contemplates the juvenile will participate in good faith in the restorative process, we remand to the juvenile court to determine whether that was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases