1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 245 P.3d
  5. 245 P.3d 887 (2010)
 

STATE v. MILLER

No. 2 CA-SA 2010-0058.

245 P.3d 887 (2010)

The STATE of Arizona, Petitioner, v. Hon. Michael MILLER and Hon. Richard Nichols, Judges of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Pima, Respondents, and Orleans Paloma Estrella and Juan Carlos Holguin, Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

December 13, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barbara LaWall , Pima County Attorney By Jacob R. Lines , Tucson, Attorneys for Petitioner.

Bradley J. Armstrong , Tucson, Attorney for Real Party in Interest Estrella.

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action, the State of Arizona seeks relief from the respondent judges' orders precluding the state from presenting voice recognition testimony at trial.1 The question raised is whether the respondents abused their discretion in precluding the state's witness from testifying in the underlying criminal proceedings against the defendants, real-parties-in-interest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases