ROMLEY v. DAUGHTON

No. 1 CA-SA 09-0212.

241 P.3d 518 (2010)

Richard M. ROMLEY, in his official capacity as Maricopa County Attorney, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Donald DAUGHTON, Retired Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; and its Members; Fulton Brock; Don Stapley; Andrew Kunasek; Max Wilson; and Mary Rose Wilcox, in their official capacities as Maricopa County Supervisors; Maricopa County, Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

October 28, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C. By J. Scott Rhodes , Phoenix, Attorneys for Petitioner.

Polsinelli Shughart, P.C. By Thomas K. Irvine , Phoenix, Attorneys for Real Parties in Interest.


GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action, the Maricopa County Attorney challenges the trial court's determination that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors ("Board") was lawfully entitled to (1) retain independent legal counsel to advise it about whether the County Attorney had conflicts of interest in representing the Board and (2) create and fund litigation departments, separate from the County Attorney's office, to handle the county's civil legal matters...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases