HAMILL v. MID-CENTURY INS. CO.

No. 2 CA-CV 2010-0044.

238 P.3d 654 (2010)

David HAMILL, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

September 3, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Risner & Graham By Kenneth K. Graham , Tucson, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Udall Law Firm, LLP By D. Burr Udall , Tucson, Attorneys for Defendant/Appellee.


OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant David Hamill appeals from the trial court's summary judgment in favor of appellee Mid-Century Insurance Company (hereinafter Mid-Century). He claims the court erred in determining he was not entitled to recover under the underinsured motorist provision (UIM) of his automobile liability policy with Mid-Century. Because the court correctly determined that Hamill's UIM provision does not afford coverage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases