AMTRUST BANK v. FOSSETT

No. 1 CA-CV 08-0840.

224 P.3d 935 (2009)

AMTRUST BANK, a division of Ohio Savings Bank, a financial institution, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Ricki R. FOSSETT and Diane Lynn Fossett, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

December 15, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gust Rosenfeld, PLC by Madeleine C. Wanslee, Christina M. Noyes, Phoenix, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee.

Law Offices of Michael E. St. George, PC by Michael E. St George, Tempe, Attorneys for Defendants/Appellants.


OPINION

JOHNSEN, Judge.

¶ 1 Years after the borrowers in this case defaulted on a loan, the lender issued a federal tax Form 1099-C indicating the debt was cancelled. The lender then sued the borrowers on the obligation. On summary judgment, the borrowers did not dispute the default, but argued they were not liable because the lender had cancelled the debt. We hold that while issuance of a Form 1099-C may be prima facie evidence of cancellation of a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases