1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 221 P.3d
  5. 221 P.3d 375 (2009)
 

REL v. TUCSON DEPT. OF PROCUREMENT

No. 2 CA-CV 2009-0022.

221 P.3d 375 (2009)

RICHARD E. LAMBERT, LTD., Plaintiff/Appellee, v. CITY OF TUCSON DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT, Defendant/Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

December 4, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Durazzo & Eckel, P.C. by Patric E. Durazzo and Eric Hawkins, Tucson, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee.

Mesch, Clark & Rothschild, P.C. by Melvin C. Cohen, Scott H. Gan and Paul A. Loucks, Tucson, Attorneys for Defendant/Appellant.

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant City of Tucson appeals from the superior court's judgment partially overturning the City Procurement Director's determination upholding liquidated damages assessed against appellee, Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. (hereinafter REL). The City also appeals the superior court's order granting REL's request for attorney fees. Because substantial evidence supports the Director's decision, we reverse the superior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases