BILL H. WALMSLEY, Judge.
Appellant Charles Hicks was convicted by a jury of the rape of S.H. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence that supported his conviction. We affirm.
In a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, considering only that evidence that supports the verdict. Purdie v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.