KARMAN, INC v. ELLIOTT

CA10-248.

2010 Ark.App. 654

KARMAN, INC, Appellant, v. Rick ELLIOTT and Tonya Elliott, Individually and d/b/a Pleasure Apparel, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division IV.

Opinion Delivered October 6, 2010.


JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge.

Appellant argues that the trial court erred in setting aside a writ of garnishment for failure to strictly com ply with the statutory service requirem ents, i.e., service upon a nam ed individual at a residence. We find no error, and we affirm.

Appellant sued Rick and Tonya Elliott, who were conducting a business called "Pleasure Apparel," for debt arising from default on a com mercial credit agreement applied for by the Elliotts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases