SEIZ CO. v. STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSP. DEPT.

No. 09-46.

324 S.W.3d 336 (2009)

2009 Ark. 361

SEIZ COMPANY, d/b/a Seiz Sign Company, Appellant, v. ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

June 18, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Quattlebaum, Grooms, Tull & Burrow, PLLC, by: John E. Tull III , Little Rock, and Brandon B. Cate , Springdale, for appellant.

Robert L. Wilson , Chief Counsel, and Michelle L. Davenport , Staff Attorney, Arkansas Highway & Transp. Dep't, Little Rock, for appellee.


JIM GUNTER, Justice.

Appellant, Seiz Sign Company, appeals the decision of the circuit court affirming the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department's (AHTD) denial of appellant's application for a billboard sign permit. On appeal, appellant asserts that the AHTD has incorrectly interpreted Ark.Code Ann. § 27-74-210 (Repl.1994) and that there was no substantial evidence supporting the denial of the application. As this case raises an issue of statutory interpretation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases