1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 321 S.W.3d
  5. 321 S.W.3d 270 (2009)
 

SEALING DEVICES, INC. v. McKINNEY

No. CA 08-1264.

321 S.W.3d 270 (2009)

2009 Ark. App. 412

SEALING DEVICES, INC., Appellant, v. James McKINNEY and Industrial Fluid Solutions, Inc., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas.

May 20, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Newell & Hargraves, by: Burt Newell , Hot Springs, for appellant.

Byrd Law Firm, P.A., by: John R. Byrd, Jr. , Hamburg, for appellee.

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge.

Sealing Devices, Inc., brings this appeal from a jury verdict in its favor against appellee James McKinney. The jury awarded damages in the sum of $8,044.31. Sealing Devices, Inc. (SDI), asserts two points on appeal: first, it contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion for new trial on the basis of the inadequacy of damages awarded. Second, it contends that the trial court erred in refusing its proffered instruction on loss of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases