Ex parte INTERNATIONAL REFINING & MANUFACTURING CO. d/b/a IRMCO, et al.
(In re Bell Carr, Jr., et al. v. Arvin Industries d/b/a Arvin-Meritor, Inc., et al.).
Ex parte GE Betz, Inc., et al.
(In re Bell Carr, Jr., et al. v. Arvin Industries d/b/a Arvin-Meritor, Inc., et al.).
Supreme Court of Alabama.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
James E. Fleenor, Jr. , of Fleenor & Green, LLP, Tuscaloosa; and J. Stan Sexton of Shock Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., Kansas City, Mo, for petitioner Buckman Laboratories, Inc.
Timothy W. Knight and Lucy W. Jordan of Kee Law Firm, LLC, Birmingham, for petitioners The ESAB Group, Inc., and Lincoln Electronic Company.
International Refining & Manufacturing Co. d/b/a IRMCO, among others, and GE Betz, Inc., among others, separately seek mandamus relief from the trial court's denial of a motion for a summary judgment and a motion to dismiss. Although the first named petitioner differs in each petition, the petitioners in both are the same. Therefore...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.