1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.3d
  4. 142 So.3d
  5. 142 So.3d 529 (2013)
 

STACEY v. PEED

1120661.

142 So.3d 529 (2013)

George Patrick STACEY and Innovative Treasury Systems, Inc. v. Anthony Lee PEED.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 4, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark David Pratt , Birmingham, for appellants.

Richard E. Davis of Davis & Fields, P.C., Daphne, for appellee.

STUART, Justice.

On August 8, 2010, George Patrick Stacey and Innovative Treasury Systems, Inc. ("I.T.S."), filed a complaint in the Baldwin Circuit Court against Anthony Lee Peed.1 Stacey and I.T.S. alleged that Peed owed them $161,365.78 plus interest based upon three claims asserted in the complaint — breach of contract, account stated, and money lent. Peed answered the complaint, denying that he was indebted to Stacey and I...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases