1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.3d
  4. 147 So.3d
  5. 147 So.3d 973 (2011)
 

EX PARTE HODGES

1100112.

147 So.3d 973 (2011)

Ex parte Melvin Gene HODGES. (In re Melvin Gene Hodges v. State of Alabama).

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 26, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Segall and J. David Martin of Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A., Montgomery; and Robert L. Aldisert and Nathan Christensen of Perkins Coie LLP, Portland, Oregon, for petitioner.

Luther Strange , atty. gen., and John C. Neiman, Jr. , and Prim F. Escalona , deputy attys. gen., for respondent.

WOODALL, Justice.

Melvin Gene Hodges petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari, which we granted for the limited purpose of determining whether the Court of Criminal Appeals' judgment, insofar as it affirmed the trial court's summary denial of Hodges's petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., alleging juror misconduct during the voir dire examination, conflicts with this Court's decision in Ex parte Burgess,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases